Information on current issues

Terik Hashmi Blog

Terik Hashmi BlogTerik Hashmi BlogTerik Hashmi Blog

Terik Hashmi Blog

Terik Hashmi BlogTerik Hashmi BlogTerik Hashmi Blog
  • Home
  • About Terik Hashmi
  • News
  • Law Instruction Series
  • Pre-Order new Book
  • Chestrest
  • Blank
  • U.S. Business Immigration
  • More
    • Home
    • About Terik Hashmi
    • News
    • Law Instruction Series
    • Pre-Order new Book
    • Chestrest
    • Blank
    • U.S. Business Immigration
  • Home
  • About Terik Hashmi
  • News
  • Law Instruction Series
  • Pre-Order new Book
  • Chestrest
  • Blank
  • U.S. Business Immigration
Businessman working at his desk with documents and coffee.

U.S. Business Immigration

Five Immigration Decisions for Artists and Athletes Starting a US Business

By Terik Hashmi


An artist can own an American company without having permission to work in it. That distinction deserves attention before a promising venture becomes a signed lease, a payroll obligation, or an advertised opening date.


For athletes and creative professionals becoming entrepreneurs, immigration planning belongs alongside the business plan. E-2 treaty investor status, L-1A intracompany transfers, and the EB-5 immigrant investor program offer different possibilities. Choosing among them requires decisions about the founder’s role and the enterprise itself. The hypothetical situations below illustrate five issues to resolve early, including one example from outside the creative industries.


Define the work you intend to perform.


Start with a realistic description of your working week. An academy owner who personally delivers most lessons has a different assignment from an executive responsible for several instructors and the organization’s expansion. The immigration application must reflect that distinction.

Consider a German pharmacist planning a mobile-pharmacy service for Native American communities in the Southwest. If the pharmacist manages an established German business that acquires a qualifying U.S. subsidiary, L-1A may warrant consideration. The proposed American role must be primarily managerial or executive. Regularly driving the vehicle and filling prescriptions would make that theory difficult to sustain.

An L-1A case also requires a qualifying relationship between the businesses and generally at least one continuous year of qualifying employment abroad within the relevant preceding three years. The overseas operation must continue doing business. A purchase agreement alone establishes neither the applicant’s employment history nor the nature of the proposed duties. USCIS L-1A requirements


Choose an ownership structure that supports the application


Outside funding can help a venture grow, but the terms deserve immigration review before allocating shares and voting rights.

Imagine a Japanese judo champion investing in an American school. Japan is an E-2 treaty country, so that classification could be a fit. The champion would need to establish authority to develop and direct the school, generally through ownership of at least half the enterprise or another qualifying means of operational control.

The business must also satisfy treaty nationality requirements. A financing arrangement that changes ownership or control can therefore affect eligibility. The operating agreement should accurately identify who holds the relevant authority; the athlete’s name on the building does not answer that question. State Department treaty investor guidance

E-2 has no universal dollar threshold. The investment must be substantial relative to the cost of establishing or buying the business. The petitioner should document committed expenditures for the proposed operation and the lawful origin of the funds. Money merely available in a bank account for possible future spending does not establish the required investment. The capital must be commercially at risk. USCIS E-2 guidance


Identify the person who qualifies through the investment


A founder’s commercial importance and immigration eligibility are separate questions. This matters most when one partner contributes expertise and another supplies the capital.

Suppose a famous pastry chef joins a foreign investor to launch a culinary arts school in Florida. The chef develops the curriculum and attracts students. The investor finances the project and pursues EB-5. That arrangement may support the investor’s immigration case, but it does not automatically provide the chef with a green card or work authorization.

To qualify independently through EB-5, the chef would need to make the required qualifying investment and satisfy the program’s other conditions. Personal services and reputation do not replace qualifying capital. If the chef relies on another immigration category, that application needs its own legal and factual foundation.

As of September 2026, EB-5 generally requires $1,050,000, reduced to $800,000 for qualifying targeted employment areas or infrastructure projects. A Florida location alone does not make the investor eligible for the reduced amount. Statutory inflation adjustments begin January 1, 2027. The investor must document the lawful source and transfer of the capital, place it at risk, and participate in management through operational responsibilities or policy formulation. USCIS investor eligibility guidance


Build a staffing budget that can withstand scrutiny


Hiring projections serve different purposes under different classifications. Treating them as interchangeable can produce a business plan that misses the relevant legal requirement.

For a standalone EB-5 culinary school, the investment must create at least ten qualifying full-time direct jobs per investor. Admissions personnel, instructors, and other employees may contribute to that total if their positions and employment meet the applicable requirements. Student enrollment is evidence of potential revenue, not job creation on its own. USCIS EB-5 program requirements

The judo school’s E-2 analysis asks whether the enterprise is more than marginal. It must have the present or future capacity to generate more than a minimal living for the investor and family, or make a significant economic contribution. There is no equivalent ten-job rule. For an L-1A operation, staffing and organizational evidence must support the claimed managerial or executive role.

The budget should explain how the proposed organization will function. For the academy, reconcile class capacity and tuition with coaching hours and payroll. For the pharmacy, identify who delivers licensed services while the applicant manages. Unsupported hiring promises can weaken both the financial forecast and the immigration argument.


Coordinate the opening date with the immigration timetable


A business may be ready to trade before its founder is authorized to work there. Identify who can lawfully handle operations during that interval, and avoid making the opening depend on an assumed approval date.

For a qualifying new-office L-1A petition, initial approval is limited to one year, and the evidence must show that the operation will support a managerial or executive position within that period. Acquiring an existing business does not automatically make it a new office.

Longer-term plans also differ. E-2 and L-1A are temporary classifications; neither automatically grants permanent residence. EB-5 initially leads to conditional permanent residence, with a later application to remove the conditions. Immigration approval also leaves professional licensing and other operating permissions to be addressed separately. USCIS entrepreneur options

Before committing to a launch, review the ownership documents, funding records, and proposed duties together. A viable immigration strategy should explain how this particular founder can lawfully carry out the business plan, from the first authorized workday through the enterprise’s next stage of growth. (Terik Hashmi)

Copyright © 2026 Terik Hashmi blog on U.S. visa & immigration - All Rights Reserved.

  • Law Instruction Series

Powered by